MANILA, Philippines — Former President Rodrigo Duterte agreed with a lawmaker’s suggestion that his statement taking “full legal, moral responsibility” for his administration’s war on drugs could be seen as an “extrajudicial confession of guilt.”
Duterte said this to Batangas Rep. Gerville Luistro after she asked the former president to define the principles of conspiracy, which are: principal by inducement, principal by indispensable cooperation, and principal by direct participation.
Article continues after this advertisementREAD: Duterte takes ‘full legal, moral responsibility’ for drug war
FEATURED STORIES NEWSINFO New storm forecast to enter PAR Thursday to be named Pepito NEWSINFO Tensions flare as Brosas, Duterte trade barbs in drug war hearing NEWSINFO Typhoon Ofel keeps its strength over PH Sea; Signal No. 2 up in 2 areas“An inducement could be money usually or inducement by a woman to a man to kill her husband so they can live forever happily ever after,” Duterte explained during the House quad committee’s 11th hearing on Wednesday.
When it comes to principal by indispensable cooperation, Duterte said a person could be held liable if, for example, they “provided a vehicle” for the commission of a crime.
Article continues after this advertisementOn the other hand, principal by direct participation means that a person planned to commit the crime and participated in the process.
Article continues after this advertisementAfter this explanation, Luistro referred back to Duterte’s statement during the Senate blue ribbon subcommittee’s investigation into his war on drugs last October 28.
Article continues after this advertisement“It is my humble submission, Mr. Chair, that the former president can be considered liable for all these crimes the theory of conspiracy by being a principal by inducement,” she said.
“I wish to manifest, Mr. Chair, that without the order, without the reward, these police operatives should not have resulted in killing a huge number of victims of the war on drugs,” she added.
Article continues after this advertisementREAD: Palace: Duterte free to surrender to ICC if he wishes
The lawmaker then asked Duterte if his statement could be considered an “extrajudicial confession of guilt,” to which the latter replied: “In the sense yes, I can’t do anything about it anymore.”
“Are you saying yes?” Luistro asked again, clarifying.
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
“Yesjlbet, because I ordered the campaign against illegal drugs. At kung anong ginawa nila, whether illegal or not, ako nagutos (Whatever they did, whether illegal or not, I ordered it). In that sense, I take that responsibility for their actions,” he answered.
READ NEXT Bishop Teodoro Buhain Jr. dies at 87 Manila Water champions sustainability with climate change policy EDITORS' PICK House probe into Duterte drug war won’t be fair – VP Sara Kai Sotto, AJ Edu dealing with injuries ahead of Gilas Fiba qualifiers Typhoon Ofel keeps its strength over PH sea; Signal No. 2 up in 2 areas Royina Garma may apply for asylum in the US, lawyer says Hints point to Belle Mariano singing Filipino version of ‘Moana 2’ track Manila Water champions sustainability with climate change policy MOST READ PH summons Chinese envoy to protest Bajo de Masinloc baselines Pagasa explains why Northern Luzon is often hit by recent typhoons LIVE UPDATES: Typhoon Ofel New storm forecast to enter PAR Thursday to be named Pepito Follow @FMangosingINQ on Twitter --> View comments